Comparative Assessment of Genetic Diversity of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes with Various Levels of Resistance to Bacterial Wilt Through SSR and AFLP Analyses

Huifang Jiang; Boshou Liao; Xiaoping Ren; Yong Lei; Emma Mace; Tingdong Fu; J.H. Crouch

doi:10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60060-5

Volume 34 Issue 6

Jun. 2007

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Genetics and Genomics > 2007 > 34(6): 544-554

PDF( 340 KB)

Comparative Assessment of Genetic Diversity of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes with Various Levels of Resistance to Bacterial Wilt Through SSR and AFLP Analyses

doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60060-5

a
Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China
b
College of Plant Science and Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
c
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, A. P. 502324, India

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail address: peanutlab@oilcrops.cn (Huifang Jiang)
Received Date: 2006-10-23
Accepted Date: 2006-12-11

Available Online: 2007-06-27

Publish Date: 2007-06-20

Abstract

Abstract

Bacterial wilt (BW) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is an important constraint to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in several Asian and African countries, and planting BW-resistant cultivars is the most feasible method for controlling the disease. Although several BW-resistant peanut germplasm accessions have been identified, the genetic diversity among these has not been properly investigated, which has impeded efficient utilization. In this study, the genetic relationships of 31 peanut genotypes with various levels of resistance to BW were assessed based on SSR and AFLP analyses. Twenty-nine of 78 SSR primers and 32 of 126 AFLP primer combinations employed in this study were polymorphic amongst the peanut genotypes tested. The SSR primers amplified 91 polymorphic loci in total with an average of 3.14 alleles per primer, and the AFLP primers amplified 72 polymorphic loci in total with an average of 2.25 alleles per primer. Four SSR primers (14H06, 7G02, 3A8, 16C6) and one AFLP primer (P1M62) were found to be most efficient in detecting diversity. The genetic distance between pairs of genotypes ranged from 0.12 to 0.94 with an average of 0.53 in the SSR data and from 0.06 to 0.57 with an average of 0.25 in the AFLP data. The SSR-based estimates of the genetic distance were generally larger than that based on the AFLP data. The genotypes belonging to subsp.fastigiata possessed wider diversity than that of subsp. hypogaea. The clustering of genotypes based on the SSR and AFLP data were similar but the SSR clustering was more consistent with morphological classification of A. hypogaea. Optimum diverse genotypes of both subsp. hypogaea and subsp. fastigiata can be recommended based on this analysis for developing mapping populations and breeding for high yielding and resistant cultivars.
- peanut,
- bacterial wilt resistance,
- genetic diversity,
- SSR,
- AFLP

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	Liao BS, Duan NX, Wang YY, Sun DR, Mehan VK. Host-plant resistance to groundnut bacterial wilt: genetic diversity and enhancement. In: Groundnut bacterial wilt in Asia: proceedings of the Third Working Group Meeting, Wuhan, China. Mehan VK, MeDonald D (eds). ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 1994, 91-96.
[2]	Liang XQ Present status of groundnut bacterial wilt in south China. In: Groundnut bacterial wilt: proceedings of the Fourth Working Group Meeting, Vietnam Agricultural Science Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam. S Pande, Liao BS, Hong NX, Johansen C, Gowda CLL, eds. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, India. 1998, 23-26.
[3]	Liao BS, Duan NX, Jiang HF, Liang XQ, Gao GQ. Germplasm screening and breeding for resistance to bacterial wilt in China. In: Groundnut bacterial wilt: proceedings of the Fourth Working Group Meeting, Vietnam Agricultural Science Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam. Pande S, Liao BS, Hong NX, Johansen C, Gowda CLL, eds. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, India. 1998, 75-81.
[4]	Duan, NX, Tan, et al. Screening groundnut germplasm for resistance to bacterial wilt Oil Crops of China, 15 (1993),pp. 22-25
[5]	Liao BS. A broad review and perspectives on breeding for resistance to bacterial wilt. In: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC, eds. The American Phytopathological Society. 2005, 225-238.
[6]	Liao BS, Liang XQ, Jiang HF, Lei Y, Shan ZH, Zhang XY. Progress on genetic enhancement for resistance to groundnut bacterial wilt in China. In: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC, eds. The American Phytopathological Society. 2005, 239-246.
[7]	Jiang, HF, Duan, et al. Evaluation of groundnut germplasm Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 20 (1998),pp. 31-35
[8]	Dwivedi, SL, Gurtu, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity among selected groundnut germplasm I: RAPD analysis. Plant Breed, 120 (2001),pp. 345-349
[9]	Ferguson, ME, Burow, et al. Microsatellite identification and characterization in peanut (A. hypogaea L.) Theor Appl Genet., 108 (2004),pp. 1064-1070
[10]	Ferguson, ME, Bramel, et al. Gene diversity among botanical varieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Crop Sci., 44 (2004),pp. 1847-1854
[11]	He, GH, Prakash, et al. Identification of polymorphic DNA markers in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Euphytica., 97 (1997),pp. 143-149
[12]	He, GH, Prakash, et al. Evaluation of genetic relationships among botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using AFLP markers Genet Resour Crop Evol., 48 (2001),pp. 347-352
[13]	He, G, Meng, et al. Microsatellites as DNA markers in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) BMC Plant Biol., 3 (2003),pp. 1-6
[14]	Hopkins, MS, Casa, et al. Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut Crop Sci., 39 (1999),pp. 1243-1247
[15]	Jiang, HF, Ren, et al. RAPD analysis in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Journal of Peanut Science, 31 (2002),pp. 10-13
[16]	Weng, YJ, Santosh, et al. Fingerprints in groundnutusing AFLP Chinese Journal of Oil Crops Science, 21 (1999),pp. 10-12
[17]	Ye, BY, Chen, et al. Analysis of genetic relationship among peanut cultivars (Arachis hypogaea L.) Chinese Journal of Oil Crops Science, 21 (1999),pp. 15-18
[18]	Upadhyaya, HD, Bramel, et al. Geographical patterns of diversity for morphological and agronomic traits in the groundnut germplasm collection Euphytica, 128 (2002),pp. 191-204
[19]	Kochert, GD, Halward, et al. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species Theor Appl Genet, 8 (1991),pp. 565-570
[20]	Vos, P, Hogers, et al. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting Nucleic Acids Res., 23 (1995),pp. 4407-4414
[21]	Nei, M, Li, et al. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 76 (1979),pp. 569-573
[22]	Halward, T, Stalker, et al. Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species Genome, 34 (1991),pp. 1013-1020
[23]	Halward, T, Stalker, et al. Use of single primer DNA amplification in genetic studies of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Plant Mol Biol., 18 (1992),pp. 315-325
[24]	Paik-Ro, OG, Smith, et al. Restriction fragment length polymorphism evaluation of six peanut species within the Arachis section Theor Appl Genet, 84 (1992),pp. 201-208
[25]	Subramanian, V, Gurtu, et al. Identification of DNA polymorphism in cultivated groundnut using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay Genome, 43 (2000),pp. 656-660
[26]	Raina, SN, Rani, et al. RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal dentification, and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species Genome, 44 (2001),pp. 763-772
[27]	Tang, RH, He, et al. Simple sequence repeats molecular markers in peanut botanical variety ‘fastigiata’ in A hypogaea L. Journal of Peanut Science, 33 (2004),pp. 11-16
[28]	Tang, RH, Zhuang, et al. , 26 (2004),pp. 20-26
[29]	Sun, DR