Genomic Imprinting—The Story of the Other Half and the Conflicts of Silencing

Anjana Munshi; Shanti Duvvuri

doi:10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60010-1

Volume 34 Issue 2

Feb. 2007

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Genetics and Genomics > 2007 > 34(2): 93-103

PDF( 497 KB)

Genomic Imprinting—The Story of the Other Half and the Conflicts of Silencing

doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60010-1

Department of Genetics, Shadan PG Centre for Biosciences, Khairtabad Hyderabad 500016, India

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail address: durani65@yahoo.co.in (Anjana Munshi)
Received Date: 2006-07-04
Accepted Date: 2006-09-26

Available Online: 2007-04-18

Publish Date: 2007-02-20

Abstract

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that produces functional differences between the paternal and maternal genomes and plays an essential role in mammalian development and growth. There are a number of genes in our genomes that are subject to genomic imprinting where one parent's copy of the gene is expressed while the other is silent. Silencing of one allele predetermines that any function ascribed to that gene are now dependant on the single active copy. Possession of only a single active allele can lead to deleterious health consequences in humans. If imprinted genes are crucial in mammalian development, one would also expect mutations in these genes to cause diseases. Since imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism, mistakes in maintaining epigenetic mark also cause imprinting disorders. Here we in this review focus on the current understanding of this unique genetic mechanism more than two decades after the first description of theimprinting phenomenon was given by McGrath and Solter. Although the possible molecular mechanisms by which imprinting is imposed and maintained are being identified, we have a long way to go in understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate the expression of these oddly behaving genes, the function of imprinting and the evolution. Post genomic technologies might ultimately lead to a better understanding of the ‘imprinting effects’.
- imprinting,
- epigenetic,
- DNA methylation,
- histone modifications,
- non-coding RNAs,
- evolution

FullText(HTML)

References(50)

References

[1]	McGrath, J, Solter, et al. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes Cell, 37 (1984),pp. 179-183
[2]	Crouse, HV The nature of the influence of x-translocations on sex of progeny in Sciara coprophila Chromosoma, 11 (1960),pp. 146-166
[3]	Rieffel, SM, Crouse, et al. The elimination and differentiation of chromosomes in the germ line of sciara Chromosoma, 19 (1966),pp. 231-276
[4]	Crouse, HV, Brown, et al. Chromosome inheritance and the problem of chromosome “imprinting” in Sciara (Sciaridae, Diptera) Chromosoma, 34 (1971),pp. 324-398
[5]	Surani, MA, Barton, et al. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis Nature, 308 (1984),pp. 548-550
[6]	Murphy, SK, Jirtle, et al. Imprinting evolution and the price of silence Bioessays, 25 (2003),pp. 577-588
[7]	Autran, D, Huanca-Mamani, et al. Genomic imprinting in plants: the epigenetic version of an Oedipus complex Curr Opin Plant Biol, 8 (2005),pp. 19-25
[8]	Solter, D Imprinting International Journal of Developmental Biology, 42 (1998),pp. 951-954
[9]	Davies, W, Islesm, et al. Imprinted gene expression in the brain Neuroscience Biobehavariour Rev, 29 (2005),pp. 421-430
[10]	Bartolomei, MS, Zemel, et al. Parental imprinting of the mouse H19 gene Nature, 9 (1991),pp. 153-155
[11]	DeChiara, TM, Robertson, et al. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene Cell, 22 (1991),pp. 849-859
[12]	Oakey, RJ, Beechey, et al. Imprinted genes: identification by Chromosome rearrangements and post-genomic strategies Trends in Genetics, 18 (2002),pp. 359-366
[13]	Falls, JG, Pulford, et al. Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease Am J Pathol, 154 (1999),pp. 635-647
[14]	Tilghman, SM The sins of the fathers and mothers: genomic imprinting in mammalian development Cell, 96 (1999),pp. 185-193
[15]	Monk, M Genomic imprinting. Memories of mother and father Nature, 22 (1987),pp. 203-204
[16]	Michalowsky, LA, Jones, et al. DNA methylation and differentiation Environ Health Perspect, 80 (1989),pp. 189-197
[17]	Ferguson-Smith, A Genetic imprinting: silencing elements have their say Curr Biol, 10 (2000),pp. R872-R875
[18]	Recillas-Targa, F DNA methylation, chromatin boundaries, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting Arch Med Res, 33 (2002),pp. 428-438
[19]	Sleutels, F, Zwart, et al. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes Nature, 14 (2002),pp. 810-813
[20]	Lewis, A, Redrup, et al. Genetic imprinting: conflict at the Callipyge locus Curr Biol, 15 (2005),pp. R291-R294
[21]	Plath, K, Mlynarczyk-Evans, et al. Xist RNA and the mechanism of X chromosome inactivation Annu Rev Genet, 36 (2002),pp. 233-278
[22]	Ferguson-Smith, A, Shau, et al. Genomic imprinting-insights from studies in mice Seminars in cell & Dev Biol, 14 (2003),pp. 43-49
[23]	Morison, IM, Ramsay, et al. A census of mammalian imprinting Trends Genet, 21 (2005),pp. 457-465
[24]	Chai, JH, Locke, et al. Retrotransposed genes such as Frat3 in the mouse Chromosome 7C Prader-Willi syndrome region acquire the imprinted status of their insertion site Mamm Genome, 12 (2001),pp. 813-821
[25]	Walter, J, Paulsen, et al. The potential role of gene duplications in the evolution of imprinting mechanisms Hum Mol Genet, 12 Spec No 2 (2003),pp. R215-R220
[26]	Spillane, C, Baroux, et al. Transposons and tandem repeats are not involved in the control of genomic imprinting at the MEDEA locus in Arabidopsis Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 69 (2004),pp. 465-475
[27]	Reik, W, Romer, et al. Adult phenotype in the mouse can be affected by epigenetic events in the early embryo Development, 119 (1993),pp. 933-942
[28]	Pedone, PV, Pikaart, et al. Role of histone acetylation and DNA methylation in the maintenance of the imprinted expression of the H19 and Igf2 genes FEBS Lett, 458 (1999),pp. 45-50
[29]	Hajkova, P, Erhardt, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells Mech Dev, 117 (2002),pp. 15-23
[30]	Lucifero, D, Mertineit, et al. Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells Genomics, 79 (2002),pp. 530-538
[31]	Loukinov, DI, Pugacheva, et al. BORIS, a novel male germ-line specific protein associated with epigenetic reprogramming events, shares the same 11-zinc finger domain with CTCF, the insulator protein involved in reading imprinting marks in soma Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 99 (2002),pp. 6806-6811
[32]	Klenova, E, Morse, et al. The novel BORIS + CTCF gene family is uniquely involved in the epigenetics of normal biology and cancer Semin Cancer Biol, 12 (2002),pp. 399-413
[33]	Hata, K, Okano, et al. Dnmt3L co-operates with Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice Development, 129 (2002),pp. 1983-1993
[34]	Killian, JK, Nolan, et al. Monotreme IGF2 expression and ancestral origin of genomic imprinting J Exp Zool, 291 (2001),pp. 205-212
[35]	Trivers, RL Parent-offspring conflict American Zoologist, 14 (1974),pp. 249-264
[36]	Haig, D Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy Quarterly Review of Biology, 68 (1993),pp. 495-532
[37]	Schuiling, GA Pre-eclampsia: a parent-offspring conflict J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol, 21 (2000),pp. 179-182
[38]	Varmuza, S, Mann, et al. Genomic imprinting –defusing the ovarian time bomb Trends Genet, 10 (1994),pp. 118-123
[39]	Khurana, E, Singh, et al. Influence of seed size on seedling growth of albizia procera under different soil water levels Annals of Botany, 86 (2000),pp. 1185-1192
[40]	Spencer, HG, Clark, et al. Genetic conflicts and the evolutionary origin of genomic imprinting Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14 (1999),pp. 197-201
[41]	Spencer, HG Population genetics and evolution of genomic imprinting Annual Review of Genetics, 34 (2000),pp. 457-477
[42]	Spencer, HG Mutation-selection balance under genomic imprinting at an autosomal locus Genetics, 147 (1997),pp. 281-287
[43]	McVean, GT, Hurst, et al. Molecular evolution of imprinted genes, no evidence for antagonistic co-evolution Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 264 (1997),pp. 739-746
[44]	Smith, NGC, Hurst, et al. Molecular evolution of an imprinted gene: Repeatability of patterns of evolution within the mammalian insulin-like growth factor Type II receptor Genetics, 150 (1998),pp. 823-833
[45]	Hurst, LD
[46]	Williams, EJB, Pal, et al. The molecular evolution of signal peptides Gene, 253 (2000),pp. 313-322
[47]	Hurst, LD, Mcvean, et al. Imprinted genes have few and small introns Nature Genetics, 12 (1996),pp. 234-237
[48]	Bourc'his, D, Xu, et al. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints Science, 294 (2001),pp. 2536-2539
[49]	Lippman, Z, Gendrel, et al. Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control Nature, 430 (2004),pp. 471-476
[50]	Iwasa, Y The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained? Curr Top Dev Biol, 40 (1998),pp. 255-293